Claim: Why does Janie marry three different guys, but at the end doesn’t try to find another guy to marry?
Response: This is not a good example of an arguable claim at all. First of all, a claim is a statement; a generalization. They are supposed to provide the clear stance of the writer on a topic, but still be open for argument. This "claim" is a question, and can only be answered at the most. It cannot be really argued.
Claim: All marriage during this time period always had some sort of abuse.
Response: This is an example of an arguable claim. It clearly shows what this person is thinking and their opinion on marriage in the time period. It is most certainly arguable, because I know that there are marriages in that time period that went well. You cannot look at one person and assume that all marriages are like that. Easily arguable, but arguable nonetheless. Clearly showing a stance and open for both sides of discussion.
Claim: Janie doesn’t find true happiness until she escapes the control of others.
Response: Very good claim. First of all it is a statement. It easily arguable because someone can provide instances in which Janie was happy during her marriages, but there are still strong points for support that can be provided for this claim. The claim is general, including the whole book and is not just a summary. It is obvious that the whole book was considered in this claim and that it is open for discussion.
No comments:
Post a Comment